Looking back at your preliminary task what do you feel you have learnt in progression from it to the full product?
The Noise
We made sure to stick to the 180° rule by splitting the film up and putting titles inbetween the shots that would be breaking the rule.
Although I myself didn't do the editing for our film, I know how much work it is because I sat in with the editor on most if not all editing sessions. Therefore I can understand why continuity editing would be very difficult. We did our best to keep continuity because it makes the film more credible but in some cases we just didn't have the shots that matched up. We managed to force the shots to match, here is an example:

The torch goes from being in her right hand, to being in both, to being in her left, so that the sequence makes sense and she doesn't suddenly swap hands because this would dramatically decrease the scare factor of out film.
We experimented with many angles, a particular shot I like is the torch landing on the floor (1). I think it really works as part of the horror narrative because it's the kind of shot you would see in a real media product. This shot not only allows the audience to see the perspective of the torch, but it also means we can't see much of the characters, so it leaves the audience in the dark, and implies off screen violence which can be a good way to create a horrific atmosphere without making it a blood and gore film.
The next image (2) is another experimental angle we used, to get this shot we had to climb onto the bed and hold the camera instead of using a tripod. It is very effective because the angle allows you to follow her around the room, and discover as she does.
We also experimented with filming technique. The next image (3) is a point of view shot which shows the audience what Lucy is seeing as she sees it. In order to obtain this image, we had to give the camera to the actress to hold while she walked over to the papers. This could have presented problems of continuity, but we only used a small sample of the POV to avoid this.
The final image (4) shows us filming without a tripod once more, the handy-cam technique has been used for years by camera operators, by because we hadn't used it before, it was new to us, and knowing the conventions of horror films, we thought we would try it out. I think it turned out really well and adds to the product over all, it was definitely worthwhile.
Compared to the preliminary task, there is much more chance to experiment with angles and film techniques, so I think that is why it looks better than the preliminary task in that context.
As we used an experience drama student as our actress, she was used to acting, and being directed, so directing actors was not too difficult. After reading the script and shot list, she had a good idea of the type of character she was playing. A lot of the time, directing involved looking at the camera screen, and doing multiple takes to ensure we got the right shot. It took some really close attention to detail, and more than one pair of eyes to be certain that she was convincing.
Seeing as we only used one main actress, and one extra, organising actors was not a major challenge. Generally, we stuck to the call sheet and got most of the shots on the shot list done on the first night of filming; which was very beneficial, because that gave us more time to work on the final few shots on the second night, as these were much more important.
Compared to the preliminary task directing actors and organising actors was actually easier in The Noise, but this is because there was more planning involved. From this I have learnt that good preparation means good results.
Logging and capturing footage was simple enough, the difficulty came with trimming and editing clips because we had to decide what clips to use, how far to cut them down and so on. The improvement from the preliminary task is that in The Noise the shots are much more fine cut, therefore flowing better.
When it came to designing and adding soundtrack and sound effects, The Noise is by far more advanced. We played around with the recording more and added many layers of sound, whereas in the preliminary task, we just kept the sound in its raw form and made no changes to it, and had no soundtrack of sound effects added. We managed to overlap certain parts of the soundtrack in a relatively unnoticeable way and create suspense successfully.
There wasn't much to designing titles, we kept it simple and went with Arial font, white text on black background. Although the design was simple, we managed to improve on it from the preliminary task. By decreasing the screen time of each title and adding fades, we were able to make them look like real film titles. However I still feel that they were too plain, but they suit the film quite well. This is a main criticism that we got from our audience feedback, so given the opportunity, I would make a few small changes to make the titles more interesting.
Exporting video was not really different either time. We didn't use a complex DVD menu either, and burning to DVD was practically the same as exporting video.
Overall we have all vastly improved on our roles in the group and learnt something about each other's roles too. I am extremely pleased with the final product, and proud of everyone involved in making it.
Preliminary task
In the preliminary task we did a short sequence to practice our roles in the group. Looking back at it, there are a number of things that I think we have improved on.
For a start, the titles are very basic, although it was only a rehearsal for the final product, I still think we could have made more of an effort on them, in order to find out what works well and what doesn’t on screen.
I think that the first shot (a pan of me walking down the corridor) was a bit jagged, in the final product we don’t have any pans of this type, but the ones we filmed (and didn’t include) were a lot smoother.
The shot reverse shot was only used once, I think it would have been better to switch position every time the other person spoke. But we did stick to the 180° rule.
We could have benefitted from using a boom microphone as there seems to be a lot of echo in the room that we filmed in.
The Noise
We made sure to stick to the 180° rule by splitting the film up and putting titles inbetween the shots that would be breaking the rule.
Although I myself didn't do the editing for our film, I know how much work it is because I sat in with the editor on most if not all editing sessions. Therefore I can understand why continuity editing would be very difficult. We did our best to keep continuity because it makes the film more credible but in some cases we just didn't have the shots that matched up. We managed to force the shots to match, here is an example:
The torch goes from being in her right hand, to being in both, to being in her left, so that the sequence makes sense and she doesn't suddenly swap hands because this would dramatically decrease the scare factor of out film.
We experimented with many angles, a particular shot I like is the torch landing on the floor (1). I think it really works as part of the horror narrative because it's the kind of shot you would see in a real media product. This shot not only allows the audience to see the perspective of the torch, but it also means we can't see much of the characters, so it leaves the audience in the dark, and implies off screen violence which can be a good way to create a horrific atmosphere without making it a blood and gore film.
The next image (2) is another experimental angle we used, to get this shot we had to climb onto the bed and hold the camera instead of using a tripod. It is very effective because the angle allows you to follow her around the room, and discover as she does.
We also experimented with filming technique. The next image (3) is a point of view shot which shows the audience what Lucy is seeing as she sees it. In order to obtain this image, we had to give the camera to the actress to hold while she walked over to the papers. This could have presented problems of continuity, but we only used a small sample of the POV to avoid this.
The final image (4) shows us filming without a tripod once more, the handy-cam technique has been used for years by camera operators, by because we hadn't used it before, it was new to us, and knowing the conventions of horror films, we thought we would try it out. I think it turned out really well and adds to the product over all, it was definitely worthwhile.
Compared to the preliminary task, there is much more chance to experiment with angles and film techniques, so I think that is why it looks better than the preliminary task in that context.
As we used an experience drama student as our actress, she was used to acting, and being directed, so directing actors was not too difficult. After reading the script and shot list, she had a good idea of the type of character she was playing. A lot of the time, directing involved looking at the camera screen, and doing multiple takes to ensure we got the right shot. It took some really close attention to detail, and more than one pair of eyes to be certain that she was convincing.
Seeing as we only used one main actress, and one extra, organising actors was not a major challenge. Generally, we stuck to the call sheet and got most of the shots on the shot list done on the first night of filming; which was very beneficial, because that gave us more time to work on the final few shots on the second night, as these were much more important.
Compared to the preliminary task directing actors and organising actors was actually easier in The Noise, but this is because there was more planning involved. From this I have learnt that good preparation means good results.
Logging and capturing footage was simple enough, the difficulty came with trimming and editing clips because we had to decide what clips to use, how far to cut them down and so on. The improvement from the preliminary task is that in The Noise the shots are much more fine cut, therefore flowing better.
When it came to designing and adding soundtrack and sound effects, The Noise is by far more advanced. We played around with the recording more and added many layers of sound, whereas in the preliminary task, we just kept the sound in its raw form and made no changes to it, and had no soundtrack of sound effects added. We managed to overlap certain parts of the soundtrack in a relatively unnoticeable way and create suspense successfully.
There wasn't much to designing titles, we kept it simple and went with Arial font, white text on black background. Although the design was simple, we managed to improve on it from the preliminary task. By decreasing the screen time of each title and adding fades, we were able to make them look like real film titles. However I still feel that they were too plain, but they suit the film quite well. This is a main criticism that we got from our audience feedback, so given the opportunity, I would make a few small changes to make the titles more interesting.
Exporting video was not really different either time. We didn't use a complex DVD menu either, and burning to DVD was practically the same as exporting video.
Overall we have all vastly improved on our roles in the group and learnt something about each other's roles too. I am extremely pleased with the final product, and proud of everyone involved in making it.










